In a new article for Arms Control Today, Dr Katarzyna Kubiak analyses European perspectives on the impending U.S. withdrawal from the INF Treaty. Although the ultimate decision belongs to Washington, which has yet to deliver the official withdrawal notification to Russia, its execution will incur serious implications for European security, NATO cohesion, and the future of arms control. (Subscrp. req.)
Media coverage
| 6 December 2018
Katarzyna Kubiak on INF for Arms Control Today
Related content
Policy brief
The demise of the INF Treaty: What are the consequences for NATO
Drawing on their experience of working at NATO, Senior Associate Fellows Nicholas Williams and Simon Lunn explore parallels in the debate between the 1979 Dual Track decision and the current situation.
Media coverage
The National Interest article on ELN NATO – Russia statement, co-authored by ELN Director Adam Thomson, published by Russia Matters project
The recommendations of 145 high-ranking signatories on how NATO and Russia can reduce the risk of inadvertent conflict, were promoted in an article by Adam Thomson, Sergey Gromyko and Alexander Vershbow, published by Russia Matters project.
Commentary
What to expect from the NATO Summit: A new Strategic Concept?
Dr Klaus Wittmann, ret. Bundeswehr Brigadier General argues that while NATO would be right to retain the three core tasks in the 2010 Strategic Concept: Collective Defence, Crisis Management, Cooperative Security, it should agree on two new tasks: Consultation and Resilience, and that clear instruction must come from today’s Brussels summit.